Showing posts with label josef von sternberg. Show all posts
Showing posts with label josef von sternberg. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Noir-a-Thon Double Feature Part 1: Shanghai Express (1932)

A double feature from the noir-a-thon this week, first up today is the supremely enjoyable Shanghai Express. For previous entries head over to our noir-a-thon vault.



Director
: Josef von Sternberg
Starring: Marlene Dietrich, Anna Mae Wong, Clive Brook
Year: 1932
Country of origin: USA
Language: English

Synopsis: Amid the Chinese civil war a train is travelling from Peiping to Shanghai; amongst the eclectic first class passengers two former lovers, Shanghai Lily and Captain Doc Harvey, are reunited by fate.

What Indie Nights? review

Hello again bbbg readers, remember me?
It's Leah, from What Indie Nights?!


I was sorry to miss out on last week's post, on the incredible film M, but unfortunately essay-writing is what will (one day, hopefully…) pay the bills, and it has taken over my life in the past two weeks. It's a poor excuse for having missed the second ever noir-a-thon post, but it's all you're gonna get. Anyway, Brian did a great job in my stead.




And so we come to Shanghai Express, the third of our four proto-noirs, and in many ways the least 'noirish' by our strict academic standards. I would like to begin by saying that there is very little point in existing if one can't be as glamorous as Marlene Dietrich in this film, and so we should all just give up now and start eating our weight in ice-cream daily and living in unwashed pyjamas and bedsocks, because, really, what does it matter?




But seriously, folks, there is actually very little in the way of noir attributes to Shanghai Express. It collects together a group of caricatures in the forms of the eponymous train's first-class passengers, more akin to a grouping an Agatha Christie novel than a true noir. These characters were considered hackneyed and one-dimensional even at the time of this film's release - read this review from the Sydney Morning Herald in 1932 if you don't believe me. They are a humorous backdrop to the very simple plot and, if anything, distract from the sense of noir.

The one place in which we find some characteristics that will later define the genre is in Marlene Dietrich's mysterious Shanghai Lily. Her story has been a tragedy up to this point, a string of meaningless lovers and a reputation to boot, travelling up and down the China coast on the whim of men. She lost the love of Clive Brook's Captain Harvey years before and has become an infamous cold-hearted harpy with a glamorous name. Once reunited, the old issue of trust rears its head again.
Where this storyline falls down is that Dietrich is literally so charming, warm and real that we don't for a moment believe all the rumours whispered about her through the train's compartments.

Speaking of compartments brings me to the other noirish aspect of Shanghai Express - the cinematography. Although the story being told is rather melodramatic and not particularly dark, von Sternberg's framing, lighting and sets tell a different story entirely. Starkly-shadowed faces, meetings in compartment doorways and curtained windows, backlit shots of silhouettes in steam and smoke create noir images that hint at darker stories beneath the surface.




In the end, although the film has a [SPOILER] happy ending and there really isn't a lot of noir, or even plot, once again we find Dietrich and von Sternberg laying the path down which hundreds of directors, writers and actors would someday trudge, overcoat collars upturned, cigarettes lit, guns at the ready...



Blahblahblahtoby review

Following only two years after The Blue Angel we are treated to another von Sternberg/Dietrich pairing but this time in America posing as China. As it was an American film the tone is a lot more jovial and quite importantly for some, it was in English.

Again Marlene has her name above the title but this time it is much more deserved. Whilst not entirely about her, she is given a chance to show off her star quality, and the camera loves her throughout. Her performance in a second language is quite remarkable in terms of quality but I think perhaps she is most remembered for the way she looks. Scene after scene passes by with her looking absolutely fabulous, frocks and furs draped around her at all times, ignoring the fact that they are traveling on a cramped train, albeit in first class.

The film itself is rather wonderful, filled with wonderful characters and the quick dialogue we have come to associate with the era and country of production giving the story the required colour and shape. The background actors may just be caricatures of a priest, a proper boarding house madam, an Arab, an old European soldier and an American gambler but they all share similar traits, they are all hypocrites, fake in one way or another, thus serving as a reinforcement of the overall theme; liars cannot prosper and be happy as the falsehoods will inevitably cause harm. Or something like that.

The treatment of Dietrich as Shanghai Lily by von Sternberg is apparently the first time Hollywood used lighting and camerawork to highlight an actor or actress, allowing their personality to come across to the audience in a range of moods and attitudes and all I can say about her is wow. That is sadly what has been left with me from the movie, to a point where I am struggling to divert my attention away from Marlene.

Not too much in the way of noir elements, it’s not sexual pathology as such and more a film of repressed passions, the adventure is there but whilst Doc is the ‘hero’ he doesn’t really deserve the title, as he is quite ineffectual at almost everything. The major noir identifier is that of the femme fatale, Shanghai Lilly is a lady of questionable morals and revels in her reputation; men are obviously led in to temptation in an effort to be near her. Her feminine charms are directly responsible for at least one death in the movie.

This is a fun movie that brings to mind the word 'romp' in a traditional Hollywood sense, driven along by quick-witted characters and a beautiful leading lady. I can’t sing its praises highly enough, for a modern audience it’s extremely accessible and I insist that you all watch it as soon as possible.

I'd stretch to a 7.5, which equates to 1 and a bit thumbs or 3 magic puddings. How about you good people in google reader land? Any thoughts on Shanghai Express? Tune in later today for part 2 in which we review the inimitable Jean Gabin in Pepe Le Moko.

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

Noir-a-Thon: The Blue Angel (1930)

The Blue Angel PosterWelcome to the first post of the blahblahblahgay/what indie nights? noir-a-thon, we are starting with a classic proto-noir from 1930 The Blue Angel.

Director: Josef von Sternberg
Starring: Emil Jannings, Marlene Dietrich
Year: 1930
Country of Origin: Germany/USA
Language: German

Synopsis: A respected high school professor follows his students to a speakeasy and meets sexy performer Lola Lola. He becomes infatuated with her and his carefully ordered life slowly spirals out of control.

What Indie Nights? review

Greetings, Blahblahblahgay readers! I'm Leah from What Indie Nights?, and I'm super happy to be joining in the epic, monstrous beast that is this Noir-a-thon.

Our journey begins in a little town in Weimar (that is, barely pre-Nazi) Germany, where a saucy cabaret singer is about to rock the world of one stolid, middle-class Professor Rath.

The Blue Angel falls well outside of the traditionally recognised 'Classic Noir' period, filmed and set at the end of an era of economic growth and social relaxations. Marlene Dietrich's career-making Lola-Lola is a seedy nightclub singer and dancer who's not afraid to show a lot of leg, and her character is cheeky, funny and, to my mind, inherently likeable.



'What?' I hear you gasp - the evil seductress Lola-Lola, the architect of men's downfalls, that harpy vamp without a soul or a care for the hearts she breaks? Likeable!?

The consistent portrayal of Lola-Lola as heartless temptress, throwing poor innocent men away like day-old frilly knickers to me smacks of condemnation after the fact - years of femme fatale characters and dark-rainy-night noirs skewed film-goers' perceptions so that when they watched this one, they read her as a character that they knew, rather than the one she played. As far as I could tell, she was a smart showgirl, comfortable in herself, who had control of the environment around her, and who wanted a better life for herself. The slut.

As Toby will elaborate on below, the architect of Professor Rath's downfall is no-one but himself. As soon as he walks into the Blue Angel nightclub he is lost - his weaknesses, previously hidden behind middle-class doors, are splayed out for all to see, and his students and colleagues treat him openly with the contempt they have always harboured secretly.

The masterful portrayal of his downfall is pure noir, regardless of its arbiter. From beginning the film as a respectable Professor, Rath ends it painted as a clown on stage, his entire hometown laughing at him while his wife is apparently betraying him backstage. The slow spiral of morality, behaviour and desire ever downwards towards ruin is basically the template for a thousand future Professor Raths.

What a film to start our Noir-a-thon with! Certainly an excellent proto-noir, excellently shadowing (pardon the pun) the movement to come.



Blahblahblahtoby review
With Marlene's name over the title, the iconic picture of her in top hat and suspenders the only one on most DVD cases and the tagline on my box reading "heartless, soulless, she's the very essence of evil" I was expecting something different to what went down. My noir experience taught me to expect that The Blue Angel was the Marlene Dietrich character as opposed to the nightclub she performed in and that the movie would be about her.

That is not the case, this movie is all about the superb Emil Jannings (winner of the very first Oscar - did you know you used to win the award for being the best actor in at least two pictures in the same year?) His portrait of a respectable man losing his way is one of the finest pieces of acting I remember seeing, transforming himself over the course of the movie in to someone you might not recognise. Seeing the dejected figure he becomes in the final scenes is really quite disturbing.



Ordinarily you would blame the femme fatale for the downfall of the protagonist but Lola Lola is a much stronger person than the professor. She is not the evil temptress the tagline would have you believe, she finds the awkward professor charming and it's obvious that she really cares for him in the beginning. It is the weakness of the professor that is his downfall. He loses his job because of his relationship and the self respect he had just drains slowly away, allowing himself to be a kept man and going back on his principals, all in an attempt to hold on to the way Lola Lola makes him feel.

Obviously I can't let the review end without mentioning Marlene in her star making performance. It's a different type of sexuality than we've become used to but she is so casual with it, knowing the effect she has on people, that it is no surprise to me at all that she became a huge star. The simple act of performing the same song multiple times to show the change in mood and growth of the character is used to good effect with Dietrich making subtle changes to each performance.

Thematically there's the use of the Portraits and Doubles motif that would become quite popular, Lola's boss being almost a mirror image of the professor when they first meet amongst many scenes shot around actual mirrors and the Sexual Pathology aspect is clear with the professor allowing his infatuation to ruin his life. Certainly at no point would you believe that there was going to be a happy ending.

Considering this was made a mere two years after the first talkie the technological leaps that had been made were incredible yet there are still storytelling aspects that need tightening, mostly the opening sequence introducing the professor at great length which feels totally irrelevant as you are watching.

Initially I scored this a 7 but on reflection it is a lot more impressive and I have upgraded my assessment to an 8.

Excitement, adventure, a noir requires not these things. Next up is the Fritz Lang masterpiece 'M' from 1931. Don't forget to leave some blah below. And head over to What Indie Nights? for more of her thoughts and images on each film as the noir-a-thon gathers pace.

A few of you wonderful regular readers have shown an interest in joining us on this epic quest, if you have a capsule piece you want us to include for any of the movies let me know.